Chris Matthews shook the proverbial fist at this detractors as he delivered the following praise of Barack Obama's acceptance speech on MSNBC's live coverage of the Democratic National Convention on Thursday night, earning loud applause from the audience gathered by the channel's outdoor location:
KEITH OLBERMANN: For 42 minutes not a sour note and spellbinding throughout in way usually reserved for the creations of fiction. An extraordinary political statement....I'd love to find something to criticize about it. You got anything?
CHRIS MATTHEWS: No. You know I've been criticized for saying he inspires me and to hell with my critics!
Click here for MP3 audio.
The following is a more extensive transcript of both Matthews and Olbermann's post-speech reaction from about 11 PM EDT:
KEITH OLBERMANN: And now at this hour Barack Obama is officially the Democratic Party nominee for President of the United States. Vote for him or do not but take pride that this nation can produce men and speakers such as that. For 42 minutes not a sour note and spellbinding throughout in way usually reserved for the creations of fiction. An extraordinary political statement. Almost a fully realized, tough, crisp, insistent speech in tone and in the sense of cutting through the clutter. Akin to the words that were given to the fictional title character in that Aaron Sorkin film, The American President, only this "cut the crap!" moment is not the stuff of fiction. This is the real thing out here. I'd love to find something to criticize about it. You got anything?
CHRIS MATTHEWS: No. You know I’ve been criticized for saying he inspires me and to hell with my critics!
(LOUD APPLAUSE)
MATTHEWS: I think what he said was about us and that's why we care about what he said. It was not about an ego, it was about a country. And when he said it at the end he rally challenged, I think the country to make a decision. He said, "Our strength is not in our money or our military or even in our culture," he said, "It's the American spirit. The American promise that pushes us forward even when the path is uncertain, that binds us together in spite of our differences. That makes us fix our eye not on what is seen but what is unseen. That better place around the bend. That is America!"
And I think, I think that is, that's a challenge and it's an open challenge through the hearts and minds of the country. What they do with that challenge. They can choose him or the other guy. It's an open choice, it's a free election. But what he was saying is, choosing the unknown is what we did when we picked Roosevelt. It's what the, what happened when the country chose Reagan. It's what they chose, when they chose Clinton. Often times you have to take the unknowable and move away from the unacceptable. And in this case he's saying place your bets on the 90 percent. Not the ten percent where McCain disagrees with Bush.
I thought it was an amazing but, I've written speeches all my life. Of course nothing like this. And let me tell you what was great about it. What he did was, and it's a military practice. It's called attacking from a defensive position. It's how Henry won at Agincourt. It's how Alexander won. It’s how Reagan kicked the butt of Jimmy Carter. And what you do is this, you take your opponent’s best shot and you throw it back at 'em! "Are we a nation of whiners?" "If this is an ownership society, you own your failure!" "Was my upbringing a celebrity’s upbringing?" "If your gonna follow Bin Laden to the gates of hell, how about going to his cave and getting him?!" "And how dare you say this election is a test of patriotism when we are all in this together." It was a great way of throwing back the other side's best shot and saying it's full of crap!
OLBERMANN: And there is one word from this, one word said more sharply and with more emotion than all the others, not to say the others did not contain emotion, but he took the last eight years of the Bush administration and shouted at America, "Enough!"
—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
critics?
August 28, 2008 - 23:28 ET by sawing battaYour critics are criticizing you bc you've pissed on the journalistic code of ethics.
should we read 'to hell with' the journalistic code of ethics?
Yes
August 29, 2008 - 07:50 ET by 10ksnooker2008 is the year the drive by media went all in, no makeup, no camouflage, just DNC-TV all the time.
I wonder what it was that Obama said that was so inspiring? Saying nothing better than anyone has said nothing before? There was no substance in the speech, just the usual Democrat lies, and platitudes.
Did you see the economy grew by 3.3% last quarter? Why no, I didn't ... but it would have ruined my speech, so it didn't happen.
I think the news media should just become DNC commentary on the news.
No
August 28, 2008 - 23:30 ET by DEVILDOCMOMyou have been criticized for your slavishly accepting anything bho said and NEVER questioning him…oh, and the thrill up your leg.
If???
August 28, 2008 - 23:32 ET by txcoIf Obama gave a speech in a stadium full of 84,000 people but I didn't watch or hear it; did he really give a speech?????
Could you see the wires when Obama flew? Guess not.
August 28, 2008 - 23:34 ET by TexndocKEITH OLBERMANN: I’d love to find something to criticize about it.
Tired Of It
August 28, 2008 - 23:47 ET by JoelCTCan we just post a banner at the top of the NewsBusters Home Page that says:
"MSNBC Is Now The Official Media Outlet For The Democrat National Committee"
and be done with it? Darn near every story is just another Olberwoman-screech or Chrissy-fit, and I am just plain tired of reading about that sorry channel. No one watches it, and no one cares. I'd like to see more attacks on the stations people actually watch, even if it is not as many people as used to: CBS, NBC, and ABC. Okay, CNN too. Maybe limit the MSNBC garbage to a round-up of MSNBCrap once a day or something. It is really getting old, and I fear you folks are just getting lazy and picking the low-hanging fruit in order to have "new" postings.
I love NewsBusters and I'd hate it to turn into "just another blog about TV on the Internet".
I know what you mean,
August 29, 2008 - 00:02 ET by Texndoc...but when there's a two ton elephant on fire in the middle of the room you don't talk about the curtains not matching the carpet. Chrissy-fit and Olberwoman-screech are finally being criticized by colleagues at MSNBC (Tom Brokaw) and others in the MSM and it's endless exposure of their ridiculousness that finally has gotten sources like the NYT discussing the possible demise of that cable network. I thank Newsbusters for exposing every festering sore. I do agree they merit their own section if possible.
Well, they already have a banner
August 29, 2008 - 00:45 ET by KC MulvilleIn it, it says the mission of the site is: "Exposing & Combating Liberal Media Bias.” Olbermann and Matthews are not only perpetrating liberal media bias ... they're openly admitting that they're doing it. Fighting that attitude is what the website is about.
Now you might say, enough already. We get the point, the media is biased. But that's what the media wants you to say, because it means that you're so tired fighting it, that you're willing to accept it. And then sooner or later, you just take in stride without thinking about it, which is what the viewing public had been forced to do for decades.
And the only way to resist that is constant vigiliance. "we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender." Is this St. Crispian's Day???!!!
OK, got a little carried away there ...
O-Kay
August 29, 2008 - 01:10 ET by JoelCTYou not only got a little carried away, but you even forgot what I wrote.
I love NewsBusters. I read it every day. I am 100% behind them in their fight against Liberal Bias in the media.
The trouble is, 112 people watch MSNBC. And 37 of those people watch it so they can post something about Chrissy or Olberwoman on NewsBusters. The other 75 people know darn well that MSNBC is the media outlet of the DNC, and that's why they watch it! So, what's the point?
The point I am making is that if you watch MSNBC for ten minutes, it is immediately obvious that they hate all things Republican. You don't need a web site to point it out.
CNN, CBS, NBC, and ABC, on the other hand, are professionals. They know how to trash conservatives without being obvious about it. You have to listen carefully to recognize the bias, and so most people don't even realize they are being brainwashed. My dad is a really smart guy, but he used to tell me "Charlie Gibson was the only unbiased one" until I watched it with him a few times and pointed out the bias. Now he considers Charlie the "sneakiest one" and doesn't watch him any more.
That's what NewsBusters should be devoting most of their time to doing. The village idiot can figure out what MSNBC is doing.
I agree Joel - but their over the top adulation
August 29, 2008 - 01:20 ET by Dee Bunkfor Obama is neccessary to point out. Obama is the candidate of the far left. They were just as over the top bias for him in the primary (agains Clinton) as they are now.
The far left needs to be exposed because the traditional media (Gibson etc..) don't do it and they have a huge influence on this country.
Understood
August 29, 2008 - 03:41 ET by KC MulvilleWasn't trying to cause a problem, JoelCT. But MSNBC does have an audience, and especially because they're a wing of NBC, I think NewsBusters has to cover them.
To some extent, the NewsBusters plan is to simply document the bias, over and over again, so that through the sheer volume of evidence, the argument wins. MSNBC is a like the wholesale version of bias, where the others are retail, but it's still worth paying attention to. Just my opinion.
Hmm.
August 29, 2008 - 00:04 ET by iamse7enAnd to hell with Matthews.
If THAT inspires you, you are shallow human being.
Two thoughts: 1. In a
August 29, 2008 - 00:16 ET by Mark FinkelsteinTwo thoughts:
1. In a convention filled with fibs, Olbermann's claim: "I'd love to find something to criticize about" the speech has to go down as the biggest.
2. Given the length and melodramatic tone of Olbermann's remarks, made almost immediately upon the conclusion of Obama's speech, I found myself wondering whether they were spontaneous, or prepared in advance. Was the praise loaded in the teleprompter, so that Olbermann would have given it even if Obama had chosen to read from the Denver telephone book?
Olbermann spewed gaaga adoration for Obama
August 29, 2008 - 01:34 ET by PopularTechThat was the largest amount of bullshit I have heard a commentator say about anything. This is beyond embarrassing for MSNBC.
The Anti 'Man-Made' Global Warming Resource
Mark... I intentionally
August 29, 2008 - 01:34 ET by bigtimerMark...
I intentionally turned it to msnbc to hear what Olbie and Matthews would say.
I heard the words you are saying and I feel Keith had it well ready and plumbed to go...it was in the hopper.
It was sickening...
JMHO.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Mark
August 29, 2008 - 01:38 ET by Cool ArrowThey admitted to having the speech in advance, and even quoted it before it was given.
It's was as if they were two little boys taking a Playboy to the bathroom.
Torches & Pitchforks
Hey Chris!
August 29, 2008 - 00:28 ET by tbbaxterLet your candidate know that his speech tonight was seen in all 57 states.
In-Kind Contributions
August 29, 2008 - 00:31 ET by MCPO AirdaleSomeone should file a complaint with the FEC. MSNBC is nothing more than NBC's "In-Kind" contributions to the Democrat party!
Something surreal this way comes
August 29, 2008 - 00:38 ET by cest moiThe guys at NBC are seriously creeping me out. How soon before Matthews and Olbermann snap their fingers in a C formation while gushing over their man crush on Barry?
*ick*